Biography
Safa’a Al-Sayed Asal has completed her PhD from Tanta University and Postdoctoral research from King Saud University, College of Dentistry. She is an Assistant Professor of Prosthodontics and Implantology and Director of Infection Control Unit at Tanta Dental College. She has published more than 20 papers in reputed journals.
Abstract
Aim & Objectives: Th is study was conducted to determine the distance between the mesioincisal angles of maxillary central incisors along the midline to a line running between the tips of the maxillary canines (IC line) in Arab population with diff erent arch forms. Materials & Methods: 226 stone casts for selected dentate Saudi students were categorized into three groups according to the arch form (ovoid, tapering and square). Using a digital caliper, the distance between the mesioincisal angles of the maxillary central incisors along the midline to the (IC) line was measured .Th e data was collected and statistically analyzed. Results: Th e mean distance measured from the mesioincisal angles of the maxillary central incisors, along the midline, to the (IC line) showed statistical signifi cant diff erence among the various arch forms. Conclusion: Th e fundamental results of this study can serve as a guide for determining the mesiodistal width of the maxillary anterior teeth in diff erent arch forms.
Biography
Ricardo Wathson Feitosa de Carvalho is Specialist, MSc and PhD and Doctor in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Postgraduate in Implantology from University of Pernambuco, Brazil
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to structure and validate an index of the level of surgical difficulty in the removal of impacted lower third molars. The design of this study followed two steps. In the first, a cross-sectional analysis of patients submitted to at least one surgical removal of a lower third molar was carried out within a four-year period-seeking the structuring of an index-after analysis of demographic radiographic clinical variables. In a second step, a prospective cohort study was performed, involving patients submitted to the same surgical procedures–cross-referencing the level of difficulty determined with the use of the index in the preoperative phase, and the level of difficulty determined in the trans-operative phase–in order to verify the validation of the use of the created index. From a total of 1,033 surgical procedures, 753 were analyzed in the first stage, identifying the most important variables and demonstrating the level of significance of each. The applicability of the index was performed in 280 surgical procedures. In cases with low difficulty, 93.1% were evaluated as low difficulty, according to the index. And in cases with high difficulty, difficulty was registered at a rate of 87.9%, according to the classification of the index. It was possible to structure a measurement index of the level of surgical difficulty in the removal of impacted lower third molars, which proved to be a reliable instrument to predict difficulty, demonstrating high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.